A set of white floral china on a wooden shelf. Licensed media provided as editorial context.
The parents of the groom gave a recently married couple his grandmother's china set as a wedding gift, so they replaced the dishes they already had and started using the ones they had been given. They thought this was showing appreciation, but the mom warned them to be careful, as they planned to regift the set to his cousin when he got married in a year's time.
The daughter-in-law preferred to return the china now, to avoid any damage. However, this was seen as a rejection of tradition, leaving her confused about where she stood with the regifting etiquette.
Am I wrong for returning our wedding gift after learning we have to give it away next year?
She didn't want to do any damage before the next big day.
Regifting as a recipient is still seen as a faux pas by a lot of people, so why wouldn't it be the same, if not worse, when the gift giver wants to take their present away and give it to somebody else? Surely, any heirloom is meant to be owned for a significant amount of time, not just kept around for a token year like some kind of trophy. It's not preserving the tradition; it is being cheap.
The backs of a bride and groom as they walk down a wooded path. Stock photography for depiction only.
They would be passing around an unappreciated gift.
Usually when you give a gift, it is meant to be with the recipient permanently.
The mother-in-law wanted to be remembered through her regifting.
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.